What is there for to rejoice if you have the intellectual property on something? Would it be a great instrument to the economic growth of the country? Or you are just the sole beneficiary of the fruits you have reaped from what you have sowed? Explain.

If I have a very useful intellectual property on something then yes it would a great instrument for the growth of the economy of the country for it is a great valuable economic asset and one the great factors for economic growth and development.  Also at the same time I have my benefits for I can recover the R&D cost and investments by offering an exclusive rights for a limited period.

Is it ethical to blog both awful and pleasant experiences with your ex-girlfriend / ex-boyfriend? Discuss.

For me, I don't really know if it is unethical or ethical to post experiences with my partner or ex-partner but I think it is alright to post these experiences because it is our freedom. But when it comes to something that is really private or things that must be kept only between us , then it should not posted. If the post also harms or is affecting others unethically then that would be unethcial.

Facebook’s marketing director, who happens to be Mark Zuckerberg’s sister, proposed last year that banning online anonymity would help curtail cyber-bullying and Internet harassment. Then-Google CEO Eric Schmidt made a similar observation in year 2010, noting that “privacy is incredibly important” but “not the same thing as anonymity.” If banning is already imposed or will be imposed would this stop annoying comments against someone freely posted by an anonymous FB user? Is this ethical? Is this against the freedom of speech? Support your answer.

I think if the banning is imposed or to be imposed, this will lessen or help stop annoying comments, cyber-bullying and internet harassment but also at the same time it would contradict or go against freedom of speech. For the reason of stopping cyber crimes and other illegal activities, the banning act would be ethical but it would be unethical if this will go against freedom of speech. I think the best way to prevent the cyber crimes is to track down abusive anonymous users and send a warning for banning a user. Manual tracking of the abusive users than banning online anonimity is a more rightful action.